|
Polyacrylamide(PAM)
- A Method to Control Irrigation Induced Soil Erosion
Reporting
Year: July 1, 1998 - March 31, 1999
Personnel:
C. Dean Yonts, Irrigation Engineer, University of Nebraska Panhandle
Research and Extension Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69361
Objective:
Evaluate polyacrylamide for reducing soil erosion in furrow irrigation.
Specific objectives include:
1.
Measure soil loss in a furrow with and without polyacrylamide in
the water.
2. Measure irrigation performance with and without polyacrylamide
in the water.
3. Determine the influence of polyacrylamide on water movement within
a field.
Background:
Erosion
of our top soil has long been a concern but continues to occur as
demonstrated by concrete head ditches now located high above the
existing field levels. For furrow irrigators the solution to this
problem has been difficult because the inherent process of moving
water across the soil surface causes soil particles to move with
the water. Polyacrylamide has the potential for substantially reducing
soil losses during furrow irrigation.
Polyacrylamide
increases the stability of soil particles and binds together suspended
sediment which reduces the potential of sediments being transported
down the furrow. Studies conducted in Idaho suggest furrow erosion
can be reduced there by 85 - 99%. Top soil that is lost during furrow
irrigation is difficult if not impossible to replace. Cost-effective
maintenance of top soil is necessary for long term production of
erosive soils.
Another
problem in furrow irrigation is the breakdown and silting in of
furrows. This is especially true for crops late in the season. As
soil is eroded at the upper end of the field, it is depoisted at
the lower end. The result of furrow breakdown is the inability to
move water to the end of the field efficiently. This is of particular
concern with dry beans because of a shallow root system. Soils can
often be eroded to depths that are near to the normal rooting depth
of dry beans. Polyacrylamide, because of its ability to bind soil
particles, can help to maintain the original structure and shape
of the furrow.
In
addition to the soil binding properties, the use of polyacrylamide
has been shown to increase infiltration of water into the soil.
As a result, irrigation practices must be studied and adapted to
the higher infiltration conditions to obtain the desired irrigation
efficiency.
Procedure:
The
polyacrylamide field study was conducted at the University of Nebraska,
Panhandle Research and Extension Center during the 1998 growing
season. Crop grown was dry beans but was not dependent on the results
of this test. Field length was 1000 ft. and row spacing was 30 in.
Every other furrow was irrigated. Field slope was approximately
0.4.
The
experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications.
The irrigation source was canal water. The treatments included:
1) No PAM, conventional irrigation
2) PAM, conventional irrigation
3) No PAM, surge irrigation
4) PAM, surge irrigation
Polyacrylamide
was added to the water and furrows during the first irrigation.
Furrow flow rate was 15 g.p.m. and remained constant throughout
the irrigation event. Furrows selected had the same tractor traffic
throughout the entire season. Advance time to the end of the furrow
and sediment concentration was measured for each furrow. A total
of twelve water samples were collected from each treatment during
irrigation to determine total sediment runoff.
Results:
Figure
1 and 2 show the results for sediment loss and furrow advance time,
respectively. A significant difference in sediment loss was detected
and is given in Figure 1. Using PAM reduced total sediment loss
by a factor of more than five times for both continuous and surge
irrigation. There was no significant difference in sediment loss
between the two irrigation treatments. Furrow advance times are
given in Figure 2. No significant difference in furrow advance time
could be detected among the four furrow irrigation treatments tested.
In
this test, PAM reduced sediment loss for both conventional and surge
irrigation systems. PAM did not influence furrow advance time performance
of surge irrigation. However surge irrigation did show a trend of
shorter advance times when compared to conventional irrigation.
Average reduction in furrow advance time has been determined to
be approximately 20% when comparing surge to conventional irrigation.
The results of this test will be used to initiate a more extensive
study to test the differences between surge and conventional irrigation
with the use of polyacrylamide.
|